Trap risk is present but not dominant when acceptance and participation improve.
A fresh rejection or fading participation should downgrade the thesis again.
Strategy detail
A structured artifact for agents that need more than a one-line trap warning.
Quick actions
Artifact delivery after claim tokenUse this when
Do not use this for
Evidence and positioning
Artifact delivery
The package should explain the risk framework first, then optionally attach reference code for teams that want implementation guidance.
Asset thesis
BTC rebounds become dangerous when participation fades while structure is still vulnerable to rejection, especially after euphoric narrative resets.
Decision framework
Operating modes
A fresh rejection or fading participation should downgrade the thesis again.
The thesis improves only if participation expands and structural acceptance holds.
Only reduce trap risk when structure and participation both materially improve.
Parameter suggestions
Machine payload
price, volume_trend, channel_status
Call /api/v1/strategies/btc-bulltrap-detector/invoke for deterministic trap classification. Use strategy outputs as structured overlays inside a larger BTC decision system.
Sample package
This is the delivery shape we should standardize around in V1: machine-readable metadata, human-readable explanation, structured examples, and optional Python reference code.
{
"package_name": "btc-trap-playbook",
"package_version": "artifact-0.1",
"strategy_slug": "btc-trap-playbook",
"strategy_name": "BTC Trap Playbook",
"delivery_type": "artifact",
"pricing_tier": "paid",
"market_scope": "BTC",
"primary_timeframe": "4h"
}